How We Test Fire Safety Products

Independent Testing Methodology

We believe in science-backed recommendations. Our testing methodology is designed to simulate real emergency conditions and provide unbiased performance data.

Our Testing Philosophy

Real Fire Scenarios

Actual fires using real materials - no simulations or theoretical testing

Re-ignition Monitoring

20+ minute monitoring for re-ignition, critical for lithium battery fires

Panic Simulation

Testing under stress with untrained users to simulate real emergencies

Independent Verification

No manufacturer sponsorships - products purchased at retail price

Key Testing Principles

  • Real fire scenarios across diverse fuel sources and fire types
  • Independent verification of all manufacturer claims
  • Usability testing under stress conditions
  • No manufacturer sponsorships or payment for reviews

Testing Categories

A. Fire Suppression Performance

Fire Types Tested:

  • • Lithium-ion battery fires (phones, laptops, e-bikes, EVs)
  • • Cooking oil fires (kitchen safety)
  • • Electrical fires (appliances, wiring)
  • • Textile fires (furniture, clothing)
  • • Wood/timber fires (furniture, structural)
  • • Flammable liquid fires (gasoline, alcohol)
  • • Traditional Class A, B, C fires

Performance Metrics:

  • • Extinguishment speed (seconds to suppression)
  • • Fluid/agent volume required for suppression
  • • Re-ignition monitoring (20+ minutes minimum)
  • • Fire size handled effectively
  • • Temperature effectiveness range
  • • Discharge distance and spray pattern

B. Safety & Usability Testing

User Testing:

  • • Trained vs. untrained user performance comparison
  • • Panic simulation with timed tests and alarm sounds
  • • Physical requirements (strength, mobility)
  • • Safe deployment distance from fire
  • • Success rate under stress conditions

Safety Metrics:

  • • Toxic fume production during use
  • • Skin and eye irritation risk
  • • Cleanup hazards and safety concerns
  • • Re-ignition risk assessment
  • • Secondary damage to property

C. Environmental & Cleanup Assessment

Environmental Testing:

  • • Toxicity to humans and pets
  • • Biodegradability of suppression agents
  • • Hazardous waste classification
  • • Recycling options for containers
  • • Environmental impact assessment

Cleanup Assessment:

  • • Type and volume of residue left behind
  • • Cleanup difficulty and time required
  • • Professional cleaning service requirements
  • • Damage to surrounding property
  • • Item salvageability after use

Our Scoring System

Rating Scale (1-10 Points)

10Exceptional - Best in class, no significant drawbacks
9Excellent - Minor limitations, highly recommended
8Very Good - Some limitations, still recommended
7Good - Notable limitations, suitable for specific uses
6Fair - Significant limitations, limited recommendation
5Average - Major drawbacks, not generally recommended
4Below Average - Fails in multiple areas
3Poor - Significant failures, not recommended
2Very Poor - Dangerous or ineffective
1Unacceptable - Complete failure

Performance Score

Fire suppression effectiveness across all tested scenarios

Value Score

Cost vs. benefit analysis including total ownership cost

Ease of Use

User-friendliness and accessibility during emergencies

Safety Score

User safety and environmental impact assessment

Our Independence Statement

We maintain complete independence from fire safety manufacturers. All products are purchased at retail price using our own funds.

We do not accept payment, free products, or any form of compensation from manufacturers for reviews or ratings.

Our goal is to provide unbiased, science-backed recommendations to help you choose the best fire safety products for your specific needs.